A New Dimension Of Precision.
Pursuing low-micrometre absolute 3D positioning. Fixed room references. A freely moving receiver. Intelligence onboard.
Research programme. Targets, not demonstrated performance.
Interactive concept only. No live measurements or validated performance.
Optical and terrestrial radio systems established the field. NanoNavi pursues a more demanding combination: low-micrometre accuracy, room-scale coverage, onboard calculation and independently verified integrity.[1–3]
Expanded coordinate uncertainty at 95% confidence in a published study. A configuration-specific result, not a universal system specification.[2]
Across a defined room-scale operating volume, using a freely moving receiver and fixed, non-following references.
The published benchmark and NanoNavi objective are not like-for-like test results. Accuracy, coverage, motion and uncertainty must be qualified together.
The proposed system separates precision measurement from onboard computation. No external cameras or laser trackers following the receiver. No robot-arm kinematics supplying its position.
Surveyed optical stations emit reference signals without following individual devices.
→Multi-face optical sensing and inertial measurements capture the observations.
→Dedicated electronics capture timing, angle or phase before software scheduling affects it.
→The device estimates its own position, applies calibration and reports uncertainty.
Usable optical paths remain necessary. The references do not follow the receiver; illustrated connecting lines represent signal paths, not tracking beams. *Orientation where available.
Jetson is the planned computing platform for estimation, sensor fusion and diagnostics. CUDA and JetPack tools support the software workstream.[4]
The compute engine. Not a positioning guarantee.
Module selection depends on power, heat and workload. Illustrative hardware, not a finished NanoNavi product. No NVIDIA partnership or endorsement is asserted.
A smaller error is only part of the objective. NanoNavi is being designed to communicate uncertainty, expose faults and make degraded operation visible.
Cross-check references and calibration. Report measurement age, uncertainty and degraded or unavailable states.
Test blocked optical paths, drift and signal reacquisition. Report validity instead of silently hiding a loss of lock.
Define threats. Protect configuration and updates. Test signal manipulation and physical tampering.
Accuracy, measurement integrity and cybersecurity need separate validation. These are design and testing objectives, not certifications or a demonstrated security advantage. Shielding and onboard compute alone do not prove security.[5]
Start in qualified industrial workspaces. Investigate future neuro and surgical applications through a separate clinical-development path.
INDUSTRIALGuidance and control in qualified indoor workspaces.
INDUSTRIALPositioning within highly controlled production environments.
INDUSTRIALTool and process localization with an absolute room reference.
FUTURE RESEARCHFuture instrument-aware positioning for delicate interventions.
Room-coordinate accuracy is not the same as instrument-to-anatomy accuracy. Medical use requires separate validation, imaging and patient registration, tissue-motion compensation and regulatory authorization. These are target applications, not validated deployments.
Start at micrometre scales. Learn what limits the next improvement. Progress through evidence, not a promised calendar.
Demonstrate a freely moving receiver calculating its own absolute X, Y and Z coordinates from fixed, non-following references.
All stages are research objectives, not completed milestones. Independent verification, operating conditions, outages and uncertainty must be reported at every stage.
Seeking strategic capital and technical partners to bring a new precision and integrity objective from concept to independently measured reality.
A research programme deserves an honest account of what exists, what is planned and what still needs to be demonstrated.
This page is based on the NanoNavi Investor Presentation, Version 2, and the supplied NANONAVI working requirements. The external references below are those cited in the deck. They provide context, not evidence of achieved NanoNavi performance.
